"Yet, while Penn receives raves for his performance, some in the gay community wonder aloud why a gay actor could not have played his role or any one of the others cast with straight actors James Franco, Emile Hirsch and Diego Luna."It has almost become a rite of passage for these leading Hollywood actors to take on a gay role," said David Hauslaib, editorial director of the gay and lesbian Web site Queerty.com. "I think Sean Penn's career can only benefit from a role like this.
The same was true for Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal [who played gay lovers in 'Brokeback Mountain'].""I think there's probably less fear of being typecast the way that actors in the last century had fears," said New York casting director Tiffany Little Canfield. "It's not as big of a risk. I've never heard in all my casting of an actor being concerned about playing a homosexual character."
A cultural shift that turned "Will and Grace" into a Top 10 sitcom
and 2005 gay romance "Brokeback Mountain" into a mainstream success has also made the American audience more open to gay characters.But some charge Hollywood has warmed to gay characters but not to gay actors.
"When straight men get these parts, the gay community feels slighted," Hauslaib said. "A whole number of roles could have gone to openly gay actors to give them visibility. Instead they went to well-known straight actors. It's just another notch in a belt for a straight actor. For a gay actor it could have been a breakout role."
Problem is, even in liberal Hollywood, there remains a dearth of openly gay A-list actors who can open a film".
"It was hard to find gay actors who were out," the film's openly gay director Gus Van Sant told Reuters. "There really aren't [many]. You could do it, but they would be unknowns and that would be fine with me, but the money [financiers] would start to get nervous."Source: abcnews.go.com
Emile Hirsch talks about playing Cleve Jones in "Milk":
3 comments :
There aren't exactly a ton of gay actors in Hollywood. Wouldn't it make more sense to have the cream of the crop then someone who isn't even close to being as talented. Those are TV actors first of all. Maybe Gus just wanted to make a stellar film?
Lets face it, some people will never be happy.
I agree with you, BirdGirl!
Gus Van Sant has been honest explaining why he chose known talented actors. And he's gay, so we can't talk about discrimination in this case.
For example, in order to play a believable drug-addict, should an actor become one? I don't think so!
Some gay sectors are too radicalized in their opinions sometimes.
The whole argument is rediculous. People always try and make an issue out of a non issue.
Post a Comment